<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Publicis Groupe to Acquire Performics Search Marketing Business</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adoperationsonline.com/2008/08/06/publicis-groupe-to-acquire-performics-search-marketing-business/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adoperationsonline.com/2008/08/06/publicis-groupe-to-acquire-performics-search-marketing-business/</link>
	<description>Daily news on Ad Operations, Ad Networks, Ad Trafficking, Online Advertising, Online Marketing. The newest and most comprehensive Ad Ops resource for businesses and professionals alike.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 01:23:26 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Baer</title>
		<link>http://www.adoperationsonline.com/2008/08/06/publicis-groupe-to-acquire-performics-search-marketing-business/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Baer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 17:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adoperationsonline.com/?p=512#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Publicis has stated that they want 25% of their overall revenue to come from digital by 2012, and this acquisition will help make that a reality. There’s not that many serious search marketing agencies that have the scale necessary to fit in with Publicis, it’s still a very fragmented market, so the Performics acquisition makes sense.

Plus, Google and Publicis have a long-standing cross-functional relationship, including sharing of executives and intellectual property. 

Interesting that many smaller, traditional agencies totally eschew search marketing as “too complex” and “not worth it”. I wonder if this acquisition will change some minds in that regard?

I just wrote a post with more commentary and context: &quot;The Truth About Publicis Buying Performics.&quot;

Jason Baer
Convince &amp; Convert - Digital consulting for agencies
http://www.convinceandconvert.com/convince-convert-digital-marketing-blog</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Publicis has stated that they want 25% of their overall revenue to come from digital by 2012, and this acquisition will help make that a reality. There’s not that many serious search marketing agencies that have the scale necessary to fit in with Publicis, it’s still a very fragmented market, so the Performics acquisition makes sense.</p>
<p>Plus, Google and Publicis have a long-standing cross-functional relationship, including sharing of executives and intellectual property. </p>
<p>Interesting that many smaller, traditional agencies totally eschew search marketing as “too complex” and “not worth it”. I wonder if this acquisition will change some minds in that regard?</p>
<p>I just wrote a post with more commentary and context: &#8220;The Truth About Publicis Buying Performics.&#8221;</p>
<p>Jason Baer<br />
Convince &amp; Convert &#8211; Digital consulting for agencies<br />
<a href="http://www.convinceandconvert.com/convince-convert-digital-marketing-blog" rel="nofollow">http://www.convinceandconvert.com/convince-convert-digital-marketing-blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

